Centre County Population Growth Levels Off: 2018 Peak Unlikely to Be Surpassed

75 Years of Growth — Then a Plateau

Centre County experienced steady population growth for much of the 20th and early 21st centuries. However, recent data shows that growth has slowed significantly:

  • 1950: 74,026
  • 1970: 98,144 (+32.5%)
  • 1990: 123,786 (+26.2%)
  • 2010: 153,990 (+24.4%)
  • 2018 (peak): 161,960
  • 2020: 158,172 (-2.3%)
  • 2023: 158,234 (+0.04%)
  • 2025 (est.): 158,319 

According to the Pennsylvania State Data Center, Centre County’s population is projected to remain relatively stable through 2050, with modest growth possible depending on regional trends.

Demographic Shifts (1990–2025)

Centre County’s population is aging, while younger age groups are declining:

  • 65+ population:
    • 1990: 8.7% (~12,300)
    • 2025: 16% (~26,000)
    • Change: +111%
  • Under 18 population:
    • 1990: 20.8%
    • 2025: 16.3%
    • Change: ~6,700 fewer children (-22%)
  • Ages 25–44:
    • 1990: 32.2%
    • 2025: 26.1%
    • Change: ~9,150 fewer working-age adults
  • Ages 45–64:
    • 1990: 16.3%
    • 2025: 22.7%
    • Change: ~9,550 more residents 

Workforce and Housing Snapshot

  • Workforce residency:
    • 54% of employees live and work in Centre County
    • 46% commute in
  • Median household income (2023):
    • $70,642 (below Pennsylvania state average)
  • Housing affordability:
    • Limited availability of homes under $300,000
  • Labor market trends:
    • Increased use of AI and automation in entry-level roles

Planning Landscape

There is currently no single countywide strategy to address population trends. Responsibility for long-term planning is shared among:

  • Centre County Commissioners
  • Municipal and borough councils
  • Chamber of Commerce
  • Penn State University
  • Private sector employers
  • Nonprofits and planning agencies

College Towns Planning for Growth

While Centre County’s population is projected to remain stable, several other U.S. college towns are actively planning for growth:

TownUniversityProjected Growth
Bozeman, MTMontana State University+140% by 2050
Provo, UTBrigham Young University+50% by 2050
Gainesville, FLUniversity of Florida+20–25% by 2045
East Lansing, MIMichigan State University+10–15% by 2045
Ann Arbor, MIUniversity of Michigan+15–20% by 2045

Other college towns are planning for growth. Why aren’t we? And who decides if we should grow or maybe we liked Happy Valley better in the 1980’s?

5 Responses

  1. We have too many municipalities (fiefdoms) in Centre County that effecting planning is a long and arduous process. We need mergers and consolidations.

  2. Hi Tom,

    Thanks for your note—What actually triggers these kinds of marketplace-level decisions to consolidate or merge?
    Is it purely financial pressure? Political courage? A crisis point? Or does it require a shared, strategic vision that enough stakeholders can rally around?

    I’ve looked into some historical examples in other communities, and many seem to act only when forced — by insolvency, declining tax base, or infrastructure failure. But I wonder: Do we have to wait for that level of stress? Or can alignment happen earlier when the case for efficiency and regional impact is clear?

    Curious if you’ve seen any local examples where consolidation or shared services worked, or if you know of leaders quietly trying to push in that direction here.

  3. Interesting. I would like to see consolidation. Seems like Too many groups with too many agendas.
    I’ll be following this with interest. At some point I’ll want to sell my house. Growth would help that!!

  4. Our multitude of townships and boroughs are largely a product of the 19th and early 20th century when there were different transportation and communication capabilities and a different attitude towards government. Things have changed drastically in the last 100 years. We’ve become stuck in our ideas about keeping the status quo. Centre region consolidation can’t even get on the ballot to study.
    It’s the regional councils of government that have taken the place of consolidated municipalities. B Therr are planning agencies at the county, regional and municipal levels. But Pennsylvania seems to resist planning for growth compared to many states like Virginia and Florida. We never build infrastructure to anticipate growth. Instead, we’re always trying to mitigate problems after growth has happened. Our local governments and the communities seem to have a strong NIMBY attitude toward growth. Despite pro-growth agencies, people here more often see growth as a problem vs. preserving our rural character and natural environment. No wonder population has plateaud.

  5. Thanks for the comments! The benefits of a discussion. Opened up my eyes….

    Here are Centre County’s 35 Municipalities:

    6 Boroughs: State College, Bellefonte, Centre Hall, Howard, Millheim, Milesburg

    29 Townships: Benner, Boggs, Burnside, College, Curtin, Ferguson, Gregg, Halfmoon, Haines, Harris, Howard, Huston, Liberty, Marion, Miles, Patton, Penn, Potter, Rush, Snow Shoe, Spring, Taylor, Union, Walker, Worth — and others with overlapping influence

    That’s not counting regional authorities like CATA, the Centre Region Council of Governments (COG), Planning Commissions, or countless nonprofits and economic development agencies.

Leave a Reply to Bernie Ryan Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *